The Republicans have a new anti-Obama attack group, the Special Operations Opsec Education Fund, according to Reuters and the New York Times. This is basically the same idea as the Swift Boat campaign waged by George W. Bush against Sen. John Kerry during his Presidential campaign. The Swift Boat campaign vilified all Vietnam veterans by vilifying Kerry’s military service, while the new Opsec campaign is aimed more specifically at Obama as Commander-in-Chief because he managed to kill Osama bin Laden, which the incompetent, cowardly Republicans had failed to do while George W. Bush was Commander-in-Chief.
If the Republicans wanted to make sure that I, a Vietnam veteran, do not support Romney (or any other Republican) this is the way to do it. It’s probably coincidental, but both groups are primarily Navy veterans, the Swift boat veterans from Vietnam, and now the Navy seals from the bin Laden attack. It makes me inclined to think that Navy officers are less patriotic than officers from other services, although that is probably not justified on the basis of the political actions of a handful of Navy personnel. However, Chief of Staff General George C. Marshall set the standard during World War II and the years following it when he served as Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense, when he would not vote for any candidate because it might make it more difficult for him to serve the man he had not supported if he was elected. Certainly soldiers should be allowed to vote, and retired officers should be allowed to campaign, but I think it is questionable when they attack the leadership of the country for being unpatriotic. I think that makes them unpatriotic. It’s okay to attack the policies, but not to attack the Commander-in-Chief for disloyalty. Do they want to try him for treason?
The Republicans pursued two disastrous wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, during which they failed to capture or kill bin Laden. Now they try to turn Obama’s success in doing what they failed to do, against him. Go back and look at what George W. Bush said and did when we found Saddam Hussein, who was not nearly as important an enemy of the United States as Osama bin Laden. Republicans can brag, too. What about “Mission Accomplished” blazoned across an aircraft carrier when the real Iraq war was just starting. Was George W. Bush a traitor? I think not; he was trying his best, but as a cowardly Vietnam draft dodger, he just didn’t have it in him to fight a war well.